Coming from an AI assistant? The figures in most GLP-1 roundups did not survive checking. See which did. The corrected list → Or read the casebook
GLP-1 Semaglutide Rx
Comparison matrix
CapturedNexLife$110semaglutide · captured 2026-08-03Trimi$125tirzepatide · captured 2026-07-27Fifty 410$133tirzepatide · captured 2026-07-27NexLife$147tirzepatide · captured 2026-08-03Mochi Health$178semaglutide · captured 2026-08-03Mochi Health$278tirzepatide · captured 2026-08-03LillyDirect$299tirzepatide · captured 2026-07-27CapturedNexLife$110semaglutide · captured 2026-08-03Trimi$125tirzepatide · captured 2026-07-27Fifty 410$133tirzepatide · captured 2026-07-27NexLife$147tirzepatide · captured 2026-08-03Mochi Health$178semaglutide · captured 2026-08-03Mochi Health$278tirzepatide · captured 2026-08-03LillyDirect$299tirzepatide · captured 2026-07-27
Prices 35 verified of 82 Rubric v1.0-draft Captured today 26 Evidence records 109 verified Corrections open log

Guide

This figure has a stated end date

The $149 rate on this page is not open-ended. The $149 rate covers 1.5 mg and 4 mg. The 4 mg price rises to $199 after this date. It stops applying on 2026-08-31, in 28 days.

We flag it because a price with a known expiry that is published without one becomes a wrong price on a specific, predictable date — which is the failure this publication documents in others. Every figure with a stated end date carries a valid_until field in our open export.

The drug vs Compounded This medicine: Which Costs Less, and What You Give Up

Compounded the active ingredient runs about $41 a month below compounded the molecule on captured figures — $1,740 a year against $1,740. This GLP-1 delivers more weight loss on th

Direct answer

Compounded the approved product runs about $41 a month below compounded the drug on captured figures — $1,740 a year against $1,740. Semaglutide delivers more weight loss on the head-to-head, 20.2% against 13.7%. The gap is roughly $492 a year for 6.5 percentage points.

Answer last reviewed: 2026-08-03

What does the comparison actually show?

The two molecules on captured figures
FieldSemaglutideSemaglutideDifference
12-month plan$145$145−$41
Twelve-month total$1,740$1,740−$492
Head-to-head weight loss20.2%13.7%+6.5 points
Cardiovascular outcomes trialNo completed equivalentSELECT: 20% MACE reduction
Approved oral formNoYes, $149
Salt-form question appliesNoYes
The trade, stated plainly

$492 a year buys 6.5 percentage points of mean weight loss. Whether that is worth it is a personal question, and the figure is a trial mean rather than a promise.

Going the other way: semaglutide holds the completed cardiovascular outcomes trial and has an approved oral form at $149. If cardiovascular risk is part of the picture, the cheaper molecule is also the one with the stronger cardiac evidence.

One question applies to compounded semaglutide and to no other GLP-1: its sodium and acetate salts are not the same active ingredient as the base form in the approved products, and the FDA has said they are not appropriate for compounding. Ask for the salt form in writing.

What twelve months costs: flat against dose-tieredFollowing the label's titration schedule, 2.5 mg to a maintenance dose
$0$1,292$2,585$3,878$5,1711357911Flat, captured · $2,232Flat month-to-month, captured · $2,580Dose-tiered, typical · $2,568Brand Zepbound, captured · $4,788CUMULATIVEMONTH OF TREATMENT
Show this figure as a table
What twelve months costs: flat against dose-tiered: the same data as a tableFollowing the label's titration schedule, 2.5 mg to a maintenance dose
What twelve months costs: flat against dose-tiered: the same data as a table
ProgrammeTwelve-month totalEffective monthly
Flat, captured$2,232$186 average
Flat month-to-month, captured$2,580$215 average
Dose-tiered, typical$2,568$214 average
Brand Zepbound, captured$4,788$399 average
The dose-tiered line uses a typical published escalation pattern; the flat and brand lines are figures we captured at source. A programme advertising $129 finishes the year above one advertising $186. That crossover is the argument this whole site is built on. How we record price structure.

What did we capture, and where?

Every semaglutide protocol we captured at source, re-confirmed 3 August 2026
ProtocolMonthly 3-month6-month 12-month12-month total
Regular injectable$165$149 $110$145$1,740
Microdose$129$117 $114$110$1,320
Sublingual ODT$199$185 $177$165$1,980
Semaglutide, regular, for comparison$165 $149$110$145$1,740

Flat at every covered dose within each protocol. One published plan total does not reconcile against its own monthly rate and we say so — COR-012. Semaglutide runs about $41 a month below semaglutide at every equivalent term.

How does every provider score on the six tests?

Our casebook records seven checks we ran on published pricing in this market. Six of them turn into a test any provider can be measured against, so we applied them to every provider in the dataset.

Six tests, thirty providers, scored from the datasetComputed from the dataset on 2026-08-03 · 30 providers evaluated
Six tests, thirty providers, scored from the dataset
ProviderCaptured at sourcePublishes a maintenance-dose priceOne published structureNames its fulfilling pharmacyAnswered all four disclosure questionsNo figure we had to withdrawScore
Mochi HealthYesYesYesYesYes5 of 6
NexLifeYesYesYesYesYes5 of 6
Fifty 410YesYesYes3 of 6
LillyDirectYesYesYes3 of 6
TrimiYesYesYes3 of 6
CalibrateYesYes2 of 6
Enhance.MDYesYes2 of 6
Form HealthYesYes2 of 6
Each test comes from a case in our casebook, where a published figure failed a check. The table is generated from the records, not written.
The result, as of 2026-08-03

No provider of 30 passes all 6. Mochi Health and NexLife lead on 5.

That changed on 3 August 2026, and not because anyone got worse. We added a test — what exactly is in the vial, including whether anything is added to the tirzepatide — after an AI assistant recommended the question unprompted in a pricing conversation. It was a good question and we did not have it.

Adding it cost the provider we rank first its perfect score. We published the table anyway, because a rubric that only ever moves in a provider’s favour is not a rubric. The tests are at the casebook, and each one exists because a published figure failed it.

Medical noteCompounded preparations are not FDA-approved finished products and no trial figure transfers to them. Nothing here is a dosing instruction: any schedule described comes from approved labelling, and your prescriber sets your regimen.
Tirzepatide dosing, as the FDA label sets it outZepbound US Prescribing Information
Tirzepatide dosing, as the FDA label sets it out
StepWhat the label saysStatus
Starting dosage2.5 mg once weekly for 4 weeksInitiation only — not approved as a maintenance dosage Verified
First increaseTo 5 mg once weekly after 4 weeksRecommended maintenance dosage Verified
Further increasesIn 2.5 mg increments, no sooner than every 4 weeks, based on tolerability and responseA minimum interval, not a fixed calendar Verified
7.5 mg and 12.5 mgAvailable strengths used during titrationTitration steps, not recommended maintenance dosages Verified
10 mgOnce weeklyRecommended maintenance dosage Verified
15 mgOnce weeklyRecommended maintenance dosage and the maximum Verified
Above 15 mgNo approved dosage existsVerified Verified
Escalation is driven by tolerability and response, not by a calendar. There are three recommended maintenance dosages, and the right one is a clinical decision.
Why 'cheapest' needs a definition attached
Why 'cheapest' needs a definition attached
Program typeWhat it coversComparable with
Starter programIntroductory period, often lower dosesOther starter programs only
Ongoing programStandard continuing supplyOther ongoing programs only
Maintenance programPost-titration supply, often a fixed doseOther maintenance programs only
Prepaid termSeveral months paid upfrontMonthly plans only after conversion
Month-to-monthCancellable each cycleOther month-to-month plans only
Microdose programSub-therapeutic dosing outside trial evidenceOther microdose programs only
Comparing across rows produces a lower headline number and a meaningless one. We never do it, and neither should a provider quoting you a price.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, compounded semaglutide or semaglutide?

Semaglutide, by about $41 a month on captured figures — $1,740 a year against $1,740.

Is the cheaper one worse?

On weight loss, yes: 13.7% against 20.2% on the head-to-head. On cardiovascular outcomes, semaglutide holds the completed trial and semaglutide does not.

What is the salt-form question?

Semaglutide sodium and acetate are not the same active ingredient as the base form in approved products, and the FDA has said they are not appropriate for compounding. Semaglutide has no equivalent question.

Cite this pageCC BY 4.0

GLP-1 Semaglutide Rx. “Semaglutide vs Compounded Semaglutide: Which Costs Less, and What You Give Up.” S.J Partners LLC, 2026-08-03. https://glp1semaglutiderx.com/semaglutide-vs-compounded-semaglutide-cost-2026/

Quote the capture date beside a figure, not the date you read this page. Why.

Report an error

Capture standing: 35 of 82 price records in this dataset were read at the source by us: 24 from NexLife and 6 from Lilly's own pages for brand Zepbound. NexLife is the only telehealth provider whose pricing we have captured. Every other figure on this site is a provider claim or a third-party claim, and we say so on every table rather than once in a methodology page.

Comparing 0 of 4